It is Sarah Palin’s fault!
Rush Limbaugh, Michael Savage and other right wing talk radio were the trigger!
Those angry tea-party folks are at the cause!
What complete nonsense!
Everyone seems to blame everyone. Yet, for some reason, no one wants to blame the alleged gunman.
Am I missing something?
I was listening to morning local talk radio. Nancy Kman stated something to the effect that we should be more cautious in what we say and that certain words could be responsible for triggering a mentally unbalanced person. That sentiment immediately brought before me a thought of abused women who stay in relationships. One I knew in particular, after she left, would say; “As long as I didn’t push his buttons he wouldn’t hit me, for the longest time I thought that it was my fault he hit me, you know…. because I would do or say something that would upset him.”
I have to wonder is this what we have come to in society.
Are we all to be so afraid that the wrong word, the wrong comment, the wrong treatment of someone who MAY be unbalanced will spur him or her onto a shooting spree?
Are we now to apply what is obviously flawed logic in an abusive situation to society at large?
Are we now to reason that we are responsible for another’s illegal and immoral actions?
I am responsible for myself and in turn, no one is responsible for me. I cannot, nor should I be, responsible for the actions of others and in turn no is responsible for my actions. We can’t control anyone but ourselves. It is one of the main points I focus on with people who seek my assistance in losing weight. It is as true in maintaining one’s health as it is in anything else in life. You can only control you, attempting to control someone else is futile.
Additionally, I have to ask how we are:
ONE supposed to know someone is unbalanced and TWO what would be THEIR trigger.
I had a brief flirtation with the world of politics. I ran a losing campaign for Congress and I spent a brief period of time acting as a political analyst for WYOU. In the grand scheme, I was an insignificant blip on the radar.
However, I can relate three occasions that happened during my campaign that caused me some concern. Two of the three involved the same person, so I will relate those together second.
The first incident occurred in Monroe County; I was campaigning at some type of event in which there were many vendors. I was introducing myself, when at one of the booths; the person behind the stand asked my party affiliation. When I answered, I was immediately assailed with a verbal onslaught of how George W. Bush was responsible for the 9/11 attacks. No efforts at reason were helpful; this person just continued raising her voice louder and louder until I simply walked away. The trigger was nothing more than my party affiliation.
The other two occurrences happened at separate times, but by the same person. The first time I was at an event in Lackawanna County, a volunteer was walking ahead of me asking people if it was okay if I introduced myself and spoke with them for a few moments. One of the people we talked with was very eager and I spent several minutes with him. His passion was obvious, and as long as I listened, everything was calm. After a significant period had passed, I advised him that I understood his concerns; I had even jotted down a few notes, and I would look into what he had told me. I went to walk on to the next person and I guess that was the trigger. He became agitated. He claimed that I was not interested in what the people had to say. I nicely tried to reason with him, that there were other people who wanted to speak with me. Finally, he seemed to relax, I’m not sure why, but he did and I was able to go on.
The second episode occurred when I was campaigning with my then wife. We were out doing a downtown tour when I caught a glimpse of this same person heading straight at us. The speed he was approaching alarmed me and I immediately placed myself between him and my then wife. Immediately a verbal barrage of accusations assailed me about our last meeting. He claimed I hid the fact that I was a republican and his verbiage increased in both vitriol and volume. I attempted to engage him in conversation, but anything I said just amplified his anger. Finally, my now ex-wife whispered to me… and I am paraphrasing, “Subdue him or call the police.” I am not sure why, but something else captured his attention and we were able remove ourselves.
I would guess if either meant me harm, they would have done so.
The question must be asked; how is one to know the trigger? In retrospect, I don’t believe either of those folks to be mentally unbalanced, they were passionate about their convictions, but they saw my party as the cause of what was wrong and in turn, I became the object of their anger. Yet, if someone is genuinely unbalanced, inflammatory words or actions may not be something as forthright as calling someone an enemy or having a target over a congressional district.
One life lesson I have learned is that you CANNOT apply rational logic to irrational people — that itself is a striking contradiction.
Dr. Joe Leonardi
Category Archives: The House
“The President shall be commander in chief of the Army and Navy of the United States, and of the militia of the several states, when called into the actual service of the United States”
“He shall have power, by and with the advice and consent of the Senate, to make treaties, provided two thirds of the Senators present concur”
Article II Section 2, The U.S. Constitution
“The Congress shall have power to declare war”
Article I Section 8, The U.S. Constitution
Nancy Pelosi, Speaker in Chief
By: Joe Leonardi
The Democrats in the House, led by Speaker Pelosi, are attempting a coup d’état by trying to wrestle control of the Armed Forces from the President. Okay, perhaps I am seriously overstating — alright I am flat out stretching, but still and all the Speaker and key Democrats are trying to lay the ground work for the cessation of U.S. involvement in Iraq.
There is one major stumbling block, no where in the U.S. Constitution are there any provisions for the House to be involved in the process of concluding a war. As quoted above, the Senate is obligated to offer advise and consent on any treaty, but not the House of Representatives and most certainly not the Speaker.
Speaker Pelosi has outlined a plan for withdrawal. In my opinion this blueprint for exit is very much a treaty. The platform contains certain terms, if these terms are or aren’t met, consequences are imposed. This is all well and good, however, the Speaker nor any member of the House lacks constitutional authority to make such a proposal. The treaty process is to be handled by the President and the Senate. Usually this process begins in the executive branch, but the term is “advise and consent” so I would not see a problem with a Senate initiated overture.
I am well aware there is a cry for us to get out of Iraq. I am one who is of the strong opinion we had no business going there in the first place. Unfortunately the Congress, in an act of legislative malpractice, authorized the President carte blanche in Iraq. One of the stated purposes of the act they passed is, “promote the emergence of a democratic government.” Now that this is being attempted the Congress wants to stop. Granted many of those in Congress now, were not there when the resolution was passed, but none the less this open ended authority was debated, voted on and passed by the Congress. It is the President’s, with Senate’s advice and consent, Constitutional responsibility to negotiate a way out, not the House and not Speaker Pelosi. Madame Speaker, your profile and publicity aside, you have no Constitutional role in this process.
I find the timing of the proposed benchmarks and corresponding dates extremely interesting. It seems a little, let me get the right word — political.
According to reports, either we are going to be out by the end of this year or by September of 2008. I find it intriguing that those dates seem to coincide with the beginning of the primary season and just prior to the November presidential election.
Am I the only person outside the beltway who is fed up with being treated like a slow-witted oaf!?
This conspicuous politicalization of our troops makes me irate. If the Congress is in general agreement and strong in their conviction that the war should end now, they need to exercise their sole Constitutional authority and snip the purse strings. Stop these spineless, grandstanding “non-binding resolutions” and halt the money. I’m not saying this is the answer, however this is their only Constitutional option.
It is easy to sit here and criticize, especially when this war and subsequent occupation were so poorly managed, but we must respect our Constitution. This incredible document is the foundation of our government. This marvel of democracy has withstood the test of time — it has repelled many attempts to ignore and abuse it. Now, in this time of crisis and unrest, we must return to our Founding Father’s brilliance and re-read the Constitution, follow it and respect it.