Happy Easter Everyone.
Monthly Archives: March 2008
“I certainly feel employers are obligated to follow the law. But it’s not employers’ responsibility to enforce the law. It means they cannot be fully expected to be able to identify a phony ID from a valid ID.”
Dan Meuser 3/7/08 Scranton Times-Tribune
by: Joe Leonardi
Dan Meuser is a candidate seeking the republican nomination to represent the PA 10th in Congress. Because my business is in the district I am interested in the primary, however since I do not reside in the 10th, I can not vote for or against Mr Meuser.
Recently it has been reported that Mr.Meuser’s company, back in 1997, was fined for hiring three illegal immigrants. Out of the thousands of people that Pride has hired since the Meuser family has taken over, an incident over the hiring of only three illegal immigrants should be no big deal.
Due to one major misstep it now will become one.
Dan Meuser has come out as the tough on illegal immigration candidate. Yet, he does not seem to have truly researched the issue. In addition to this misstep look at his position section on illegal immigration, it states, “Before any immigrant can become a United States Citizen, we should require them to read, write, and speak English.”
Dan you are running for Congress, you should be aware this is already taking place.
One, the test is given in English. Unless it has changed since my father took it, he needed a basic, functional familiarity with the English language to pass.
Two, check the USICS web site under redesigned test, the new test effective this year, makes a better understanding of English even more of a necessity.
Three, illegal immigrants aren’t the ones applying for citizenship — so this little caveat has no place in a position with the heading “Combating Illegal Immigration.”
It appears for all the money Meuser has spent on his team they are operating like a bunch of rank amateurs.
This flap over hiring illegal immigrants should never have happened, it should be a non-issue. Now it will be an issue. Why?
It is not the fact that Pride hired illegal immigrants.
It is not the fact that they were fined.
It is the fact that he was not the one to disclose it.
If I were on Meuser’s team this 1997 incident would have been a huge advantage. Instead, now, it appears that it may provide a hindrance to Dan Meuser becoming the republican nominee.
But Joe, how could an anti-illegal immigrant candidate use the fact that his company hired and was fined for hiring illegal immigrants as an advantage? Isn’t it better to avoid it and hope no one finds out?
No! From President Nixon to Congressman Sherwood the lesson that no one in politics ever seems to learn is — that the cover-up is worse than either an actual or perceived scandal. Right now the perception is that Dan Meuser, while not actively covering it up, hoped that no one would have learned about this — which again reeks of amateurism.
If you are going to claim the mantle of immigration enforcer, common sense would have told you this was going to come out.
Who is advising Mr. Meuser? Dan, whoever it is — fire them.
How would I have turned this to Dan’s advantage? Simple, one of his first commercials should have gone something like this:
I am Dan Meuser and I’m running for congress.
Several years ago my business was the victim of the current failure in our immigration policy. Our company unknowingly hired three people who were in this country illegally. Utilizing forged identification documentation they secured employment with my company.
When their ruse was uncovered, at my direction we cooperated fully with the INS and payed a substantial fine. As a result we upgraded our employee screening process. However, this was allowed to occur, and may occur again, because of the failure of our government to control our borders.
My family’s business was the victim of inept illegal immigration legislation and enforcement. To ensure this does not happen to any business in the future I ask for your vote.
Send me to Washington D.C. so that our country’s borders will be protected.
Send me to Washington so no other individual, small business owner or company will be the victim of illegal immigration.
The above simple commercial would have:
One – demonstrated Dan Meuser’s honesty and integrity.
Two – demonstrated the he is a leader by taking the steps necessary to internally rectify the situation.
Three – avoid the insinuation that Mr. Meuser was hiding something and not give ammunition to his primary and general election opponents.
Four – identified a reason hirings like this may occur.
Five – give voters the chance to end the current government’s failures by electing Mr. Meuser.
By not addressing this issue head on, the Meuser Campaign has opened itself up to a full frontal assault. If his opponent in the primary does not attack and exploit, Congressman Carney will.
It is not too late for the Meuser Campaign to rectify its’ errors, but he needs to get away from the D.C. management and start counting on local people for his advise.
Those D.C. hired guns do not care if Mr. Meuser wins. They only care about advancing their own careers. Whether Dan Meuser or Mayor Lou Barletta in the 11th win is irrelevant to the beltway boys, the fact that they brought in “promising” candidates is enough to advance their careers.
Unfortunately, that advancement will come at the expense of the candidates.
Corbett Called It!
by: Joe Leonardi
WILK afternoon radio host, Steve Corbett, has been saying for weeks that PA will decide the Democratic Primary and after last night he just may be right. I mean correct.
Pennsylvania is now, most definitely, in play.
I thought last night it was going to be over for Senator Clinton.
I was wrong.
Senator Clinton has family roots here in Northeast Pennsylvania and many will consider her their own. That can have serious implications in our primary in April.
It is going to heat up here in the Keystone State and those of us who love politics are salivating. It is going to be interesting and fun.
Steve Corbett has been talking about this web site:
I give Steve props and credit; he has not given up on his candidate Senator Clinton and now it appears Senator Obama may have lost his momentum.
Don’t miss Corbett on WILK radio weekdays from 3 to 7pm. His blog, Corbett’s Corner, is linked on my blog roll. If you are interested in politics tune in your radio and:
YOU BETTER LISTEN
Congratulations on this call Steve.
No person except a natural born Citizen, or a Citizen of the United States, at the time of the Adoption of this Constitution, shall be eligible to the Office of President; neither shall any Person be eligible to that Office who shall not have attained to the Age of thirty-five Years, and been fourteen Years a Resident within the United States.
United States Constitution
“We need someone who’s been tested, because the United States presidency is one the toughest jobs in the world, she is the best qualified candidate.” Scranton Mayor Chris Doherty
by: Joe Leonardi
I have a good friend who is a huge Hilary Clinton supporter. This person consistently tells me that Hilary has been the most qualified democrat running for office.
I am not so sure.
I admit that I do not care for Senator Clinton. She rubs me the wrong way and I don’t think that I could ever cast a vote for her — even if she were a republican.
She is talking up the qualifications issue against Senator Obama, but I am curious how she will deal with the experience and qualification issues if she wins the primary.
Senator John McCain is considerably more qualified than either Democratic contender.
Does experience and qualifications give us an insight on to what kind of president we will get?
I say no.
I wrote in an earlier commentary that the two most qualified Presidents of my lifetime were Presidents Jimmy Carter and George H.W. Bush. Both were one term presidents and looking back, both were poor presidents. They both lacked, though should have possessed, solid leadership qualities.
Senator Clinton would like Democratic primary voters to vote for her because, she claims to be the most qualified and experienced candidate. As I wrote earlier, presidential elections have little to do with either. It is likability and a person’s innate ability to lead.
Hilary Clinton is not likable and she has never demonstrated any genuine leadership abilities.
The president of the United States must be an individual that can muster people to his or her cause. To bring the populace, elected officials and heads of state together for the common good. That person must be able to lead people of all political persuasions.
Leadership has nothing to do with education, experience, or qualifications.
Leadership is an inherent, intangible trait.
It appears Senator Obama has that trait and Senator Clinton is attempting to blunt that effect by claiming she is, and has been, the most qualified democrat in the race.
The following are brief biographies of two individuals. These biographies are snapshots of their qualifications to be President.
The first one:
-Roughly 1 year of structured education
-Elected to a state’s General Assembly four times
-Elected to U.S. House of Representatives only once
-At various times was a farmhand, clerk, flatboatman, store owner, surveyor, postmaster and a lawyer
-Served in a state Militia as a Captain and private
The above resume’ is relatively unimpressive.
No real education, a few years in a state assembly and two years as a U.S. Congressman and not much of a military career.
This person was Abraham Lincoln.
The President that saved the Union.
One of four Presidents on Mount Rushmore.
Arguably, one of the greatest Presidents in United States history.
If we follow Senator Hilary Clinton’s logic, based upon his prior qualifications, he should never have run, let alone be elected President. We should be thankful that Hilary and her advisers were not around in the 1860 election.
Next we have the following:
-Bachelor’s degree from Tufts
-Master’s degree from Tufts’ Fletcher School of Law and Diplomacy
-Elected to U.S. House of Representatives seven times
-Former Ambassador to the United Nations
-Former U.S. Secretary of Energy
-Twice elected Governor
-Served as Chairman of the Democratic Governors Association
-Authored two books
-Taught at New Mexico State University, Harvard University’s Kennedy School of Government and the United World College
-Nominated five times for the Nobel Peace Prize
-Former Chairman of Freedom House, a private, non-partisan organization that promotes democracy worldwide
The above resume is quite impressive. Who’s bio is it?
It is that of Governor Bill Richardson. The first person of Latino descent to seek the office of the President.
Looking at this snapshot —- the Governor is extremely qualified to be President of the United States.
He is well educated.
He has legislative experience.
He has executive branch experience.
He has experience in educating others.
He has extensive foreign policy experience. Instead of hanging out with foreign heads of state with his spouse, he actually worked with these leaders. More importantly, Bill Richardson negotiated the release of U.S. servicemen, hostages and political prisoners.
Unfortunately, to the supporters of Senator Clinton, Governor Richardson is a man. So though eminently qualified, he should not have been and was not seriously considered to be the democratic party’s nominee.
We must be honest, Senator Clinton is not looking to be the most qualified person to be President. She and many democrats are looking just for a woman, any democratic woman, to be President. So, intellectual honesty be dammed. The Hilary democrats want a woman, no matter how qualified the man is that she has run, is running or will run against.
If the phone rang in the White House at 3 a.m. and democrats were concerned about the right person for the job, Bill Richardson would still be in the race and he would be the front runner going into Super Tuesday Jr.
Governor Richardson was the most qualified democrat in the primary, yet he did not receive the support of his party or the voters.
I asked my friend, the one who believes that Hilary is the most qualified to be president, why this person had not gotten behind Governor Richardson. My friend’s answer was — “Because I can’t take someone who has such a bad toupee serious.”
So much for qualifications.
The Democrats may decide as early as March 4th who their nominee is. I think it might be Barack Obama.
Politically, Senator Obama is extremely liberal. Policy wise he is everything I am opposed to. However, he is bringing republicans to his side. Like the Reagan Democrats of the eighties, there is currently a movement of republicans for Obama. They even have a catchy name, they are called Obamicans.
I am not on that bandwagon just yet.
I don’t know if I ever will be.
Senator Obama makes you believe he can pull our country out of the depths of misery and hell that President George W. Bush has placed us.
The question is, can he?
I don’t know the answer.
I do know that another divisive figure in the White House, such as Senator Hilary Clinton, can not.